Understanding event stream processingguide hero background, gray with some polygons

Complex event processing

As we navigate through an era of unlimited information, organizations depend on massive datasets for the raw information and the actionable insights derived from them. Complex event processing is a prominent trend in this dynamic evolution —it is a specialized technique designed to identify patterns and trends within event data streams.

Operating in real-time, CEP allows organizations to address unfolding events swiftly. Organizations can discern threats and opportunities in real time. CEP plays a crucial role in recognizing market trends and potential pitfalls, empowering organizations to make well-informed decisions.

It is critical to have a broad awareness of CEP, whether you are interested in designing apps or researching ready-to-use market solutions. This article explores the role of CEP in event stream processing, architecture, patterns, and implementation guidelines.

Summary of key complex event processing concepts

Concept

Description

Complex event processing (CEP)

A specialized technique for analyzing event data streams in real time to identify patterns and trends.

Event sources

Origins of events in a CEP system, such as sensors, databases, applications, or external systems, generate data streams for analysis.

CEP patterns

Standard techniques or rules in CEP for event filtering, detection, abstraction, aggregation, and relationship identification.

Centralized vs. distributed CEP architecture

Architectural models in CEP, choosing between concentrating processing in a single server (centralized) or distributing processes across multiple servers/nodes (distributed).

Role of complex event processing in event stream processing

Event stream processing (ESP) is simply the continuous processing of real-time events. An event is a change in application state, such as a completed transaction, a user click, or an IoT sensor reading. An event stream is a sequence of events ordered by time. Event stream processing handles many related events together. Events are grouped, filtered, summarized, and sorted to derive real-time insights from thousands of continuous events.

Complex event processing elevates the capability of real-time data analysis in ESP. Stream processing often refers to collecting and processing single event streams, such as temperature sensors or fan speeds.

In contrast, CEP adds an extra intelligence layer to the processed data streams from ESP. It looks at event patterns to identify a specific “complex” event. For example, consider a CEP application that monitors factory machinery. It notes thermometer alerts, fan speeds, machine noise, and belt speed to identify the machine overheating in real time. As data flows through the CEP pipelines, you get a deep understanding of the data involved and its consequences. The integrated approach enhances incident detection and response.

How complex event processing works
How complex event processing works

Challenges for doing CEP in ESP

While this combined approach between CEP and ESP is a game changer, it has challenges.

Real-time complexity

The fast-paced nature of real-time streaming data makes it challenging to process complex event patterns. Low-latency system responses are critical but technically expensive to implement especially when dealing with correlations and temporal dependencies. There is often a trade-off between output quality and performance.

Scalability

ESP systems are trained to handle large volumes of streaming data. With CEP systems, the number and complexity of events increase exponentially. It is challenging to ensure CEP scalability as the ESP system scales.

Compatibility issues

Integrating CEP into your existing ESP system can be challenging due to compatibility issues and data format discrepancies. The seamless communication between CEP and ESP components requires careful consideration to achieve smooth integration.

To address these challenges, one must strike a balance between optimizing ESP's processing speed and CEP's analytical depth. System architects and developers can then implement robust solutions considering the unique characteristics of both CEP and ESP.

When to choose Redpanda over Apache Kafka

Start streaming data like it's 2024.

CEP in action: Real-world impact

Complex event processing helps data engineers create transformative applications in several industries. For example:

In finance, integrating CEP with ESP enables real-time detection of market anomalies, opportunities, potential fraud, and compliance. This detection leads to timely response for such events. It also helps financial institutions with instantaneous decision-making to mitigate risks and capitalize on opportunities. In healthcare, CEP aids in real-time monitoring and analysis of patient data, medical device readings, and other clinical events. The collected data can then help in identifying critical events such as patient deterioration or drug interactions. Healthcare providers can use the data for timely interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

CEP also benefits supply chain management by monitoring real-time supply events that ultimately help organizations optimize logistics, reduce costs, and improve customer satisfaction.

CEP supports real-time anomaly detection, proactive risk mitigation, and precise decision-making to optimize operations in any sector.

Architecture of complex event processing systems

At the core of CEP architecture lies an event-driven paradigm. The diagram below illustrates the general architecture of CEP applications.

Components of a CEP system

Architecture of complex event processing systems
Architecture of complex event processing systems

A typical CEP system contains the following key components:

Event sources

This is where the events are generated; you can think of event sources as data generators. Events can include sensors, databases, applications, or external systems.

Complex event processing engine

The event processing engine lies at the heart of the CEP system. This engine is responsible for real-time event ingestion, mapping of data, and analysis based on present rules and patterns. It works by identifying meaningful sequences.

Rule repository

The rule repository stores rules and patterns that define logic to guide event processing. It helps the CEP engines recognize the intricate relationship between events.

Action engine

Once a pattern or condition is established, the action engine comes into play. It executes different actions and triggers responses based on the events. Actions include generating notifications and alerts or starting new processes.

CEP example

Now that we have understood the theory of CEP architecture, let’s look at a small code snippet example in Flink that will help us visualize the architecture. We will use patterns to identify the temperature hikes in our stream of “TemperatureEvent” objects.

  • The TemperatureEvent class represents events in the form of temperature readings, forming the basis of event sources.

  • The temperatureStream is then created using Flink's DataStream API, simulating a continuous stream of temperature events, each with a timestamp and temperature value.

  • The complex event processing engine, embedded in Flink, processes these events in real time, identifying sequences that match a predefined pattern.

The pattern, acting as a rule, is set to detect temperature spikes – specifically, three consecutive readings above 28 degrees within a 10-second window. This pattern is part of the rule repository, and when triggered, it generates a new stream i.e., spikeAlerts, as an action, simulating an alert message for a detected temperature spike.


public class CEPExample {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {

        StreamExecutionEnvironment env = StreamExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
// Create a stream of TemperatureEvent events
        DataStream<TemperatureEvent> temperatureStream = env.fromElements(
                new TemperatureEvent(1L, 20.0),
                new TemperatureEvent(2L, 21.0),
                new TemperatureEvent(3L, 22.0),
                new TemperatureEvent(4L, 30.0),
                new TemperatureEvent(5L, 25.0),
                new TemperatureEvent(6L, 22.0)
        );
// Define a CEP pattern to detect a temperature spike:
        Pattern<TemperatureEvent, ?> temperatureSpikePattern = Pattern.<TemperatureEvent>begin("start")
                .where(event -> event.getTemperature() > 28.0).times(3)
                .within(Time.seconds(10));
// Apply the CEP pattern on the temperatureStream
        DataStream<String> spikeAlerts = CEP.pattern(temperatureStream, temperatureSpikePattern)
                .select(pattern -> "Temperature spike detected! Three consecutive readings above 28 degrees.");

        spikeAlerts.print();
        env.execute("CEP Example");
    }
}

CEP frameworks and tools

Different tools, technologies, and frameworks have been introduced for complex event processing. The most popular is Apache Flink®, a distributed framework with a built-in CEP engine with comprehensive API for pattern recognition and other CEP functions.

Kafka Streams, a client library for Apache Kafka®, also provides a scalable solution for stream processing. It seamlessly integrates with Kafka, making it well-suited for real-time complex event-processing scenarios.

Spark Streams, a part of the Apache Spark™ ecosystem, is also known for its versatility in handling large-scale data processing, including stream processing.

Redpanda is another upcoming ESP platform you can use as an event store for your CEP use cases. Redpanda has also introduced Data Transforms Sandbox for event processing. It works by adding a layer of filtering and correlation using WASM to extract more value from event data. It is revolutionary as it eradicates the need to send the event data across the network to a separate infrastructure. While the feature is a work in progress, it is an indicator of trends in event stream processing.

Redpanda: a powerful Kafka alternative

Fully Kafka API compatible. 6x faster. 100% easier to use.

Complex event processing patterns

Application developers, irrespective of the programming language of their choice, can construct complicated event-processing logic by reusing standardized techniques or patterns. These patterns represent some functions available on modern frameworks designed for complex event processing. Commonly used CEP techniques are given below.

Event filtering

One of the most commonly used patterns a developer can employ is filtering events. You can perform filtering at the beginning of complex event processing and also at the end once complex events are processed or discovered. Doing this helps you eliminate unwanted events and select relevant events for a specific purpose. You can apply filters such as severity, category, assigned users, etc.

Event aggregation & transformation

Event aggregation is a technique that is performed in the initial stages of CEP. It’s when you start collecting and aggregating events from data streams to derive meaningful insights. A real-world use case of event aggregation can be observed in the e-commerce domain for monitoring and optimizing website performance based on events like the total number of clicks per product category, average time spent on the website, or popular search queries.

Event-pattern detection

This technique helps you detect certain patterns in a data stream. It employs rules or criteria that specify the desired patterns. This technique is especially beneficial in a financial setting where you define a pattern to detect a sequence of market behaviors that signals a potential investment opportunity or a market anomaly. This entails analyzing financial data and market data to identify recurring patterns. Once the patterns are recorded, CEP sends alerts when similar patterns arise.

Event abstraction

This technique transforms complex event data into a small, manageable form by abstracting the necessary details from the raw event. Event abstraction is often used to identify anomalies. For instance, it identifies IP addresses that pose potential security threats.

Event relationship detection

This process involves detecting relationships between events based on timing, membership, etc. You can filter out related events and proceed forward with the big-picture view.

CEP implementation guidelines

Selecting the appropriate CEP system is paramount to success. An architect/ developer must asses the required processing speed for the specific use case to determine the right CEP system. Other factors to be considered include scalability and flexibility required for the specific use case. We give some key considerations below.

Centralized vs. distributed implementation

There are two implementation approaches in CEP, centralized CEP and distributed CEP. In a centralized CEP architecture, all components, including the CEP engine, are typically hosted on a single central server. This means that the event processing logic, rule execution, and associated components are concentrated on one server.

In contrast, a distributed CEP implementation distributes processes across multiple servers or nodes. It is easily scalable and is ideal for complex applications with higher data volume and processing needs. An infrastructure capable of horizontal scaling is a must.

Integration

Developers must ensure seamless CEP integration with existing systems. Your CEP components should be adaptable to your existing databases, applications, and sensors without causing disruption. Since the CEP system deals with various data inputs and outputs, it must also support the data formats and sources you require. You must clearly define data models to streamline the processing of inputs and outputs.

Event volume

CEP is compute-extensive, and one of the primary challenges is managing and processing large data volumes in real time. You can handle this by developing robust architecture for timely event processing without compromising system performance.

Event uncertainty and ambiguity

Real-world events grapple with inherent uncertainty and ambiguity, making it difficult for the complex event processing system to adapt to varying levels of data accuracy. Therefore, error-handling techniques and workarounds should be in place to manage corrupt data.

Performance

With the increased volume of events, scalability becomes a critical consideration. CEP systems must be designed to scale horizontally for improved performance. However, this can also incur additional hardware and infrastructure costs. Organizations need to weigh the benefits of improved performance against the associated costs.

Security

Data security and privacy are always non-negotiable. Prioritizing systems with robust encryption mechanisms to protect sensitive information is paramount.

Monitoring and debugging

You can use monitoring and debugging practices for proactive issue detection. The practices include capturing event flows using comprehensive logging, real-time processing tools for immediate insights, and alert systems for notification generation. These activities help with the system’s health and resolution of issues.

Developers ensure performance optimization by writing efficient code to help them retrieve faster data. They can implement parallel processing for distributed workloads, and manage resources judiciously.

Have questions about Kafka or streaming data?

Join a global community and chat with the experts on Slack.

Conclusion

For data-driven organizations, adopting complex event processing is necessary for informed and timely decision-making by observing the big-picture view. The fusion of real-time analysis with pattern recognition in CEP goes beyond mere data processing; it adds detail and context to an organization’s existing ESP systems. As the demand for CEP increases, various platforms are taking significant strides to simplify and enhance the process.

Most notably, with the introduction of the Redpanda Data Transforms, it becomes evident that integrated platforms are essential, offering cost-efficient data streaming and adept handling of intensive data processing tasks. Embracing this paradigm shift is a pivotal moment for organizations — indeed, a revolutionary leap forward!

Want to start streaming data without having to fiddle with infrastructure? Sign up for Redpanda Serverless. Spin up in seconds, scale automatically, no fixed costs.

Redpanda Serverless: from zero to streaming in 5 seconds

Just sign up, spin up, and start streaming data!

Chapters

Event stream processing

Learn about the principles, considerations, best practices, and trends of event stream processing for real-time event analysis and enhanced decision-making.

Event-driven programming

Learn about the benefits and implementation of event-driven programming, including architecture patterns, event processing, event persistence, and other essential considerations.

Event streaming systems

Learn about the essential features of event streaming systems, including throughput, fault tolerance, scalability etc, and how Redpanda excels in these.

Event streaming platform

Learn how event streaming platforms work and the role they play in handling real-time data, with a focus on Redpanda's Kafka-compatible solution.

Event sourcing database architecture

Learn how event sourcing, a database architectural pattern, captures changes as immutable events. Discover efficient implementation strategies and solutions.

Complex event processing

Learn what is complex event processing, how it works, common patterns and detailed implementation guidelines to solve common challenges.

Flink vs. Kafka

Learn about the differences and complementary features of Kafka and Flink, two popular streaming technologies for real-time analytics.

Flink SQL

Learn about the benefits, features, and installation process of Flink SQL, along with advanced operations, best practices, and troubleshooting tips.

Flink CDC

Learn how Change Data Capture (CDC) and Flink CDC connectors can bridge the gap between streaming and non-streaming databases for data synchronization.

Kafka Streams vs. Flink

Learn about the differences between Kafka Streams and Flink in terms of the programming model, performance, and fault tolerance. Learn how to choose between them.